Archive for March, 2009

What I’m up to

Tuesday, March 31st, 2009

Recently, I have not been posting very frequently. I attribute this to:

1) lack of blogging enthusiasm
2) reading when i get home instead of internetting
3) working on a private journal

However, all of the above doesn’t mean that things aren’t going on!

In addition to attending a whole bunch of weddings and spring get-togethers and working on some music with close friends, I’ve been brushing up on my psychoanalytic dialectical materialism, er, cultural studies via Zizek, et al.

Also, Incus Records has a brand new site up with over 1000 pages of Derek Bailey info, including handwritten guitar notes! Interested improvising musicians should check it out.

Lastly, how can I convince more of my friends to get on Twitter? Seriously people, I’m never going to get on Facebook . So Twitter is your only option, and I’ll be dammed if it isn’t a good one.

kind of depressing

Thursday, March 12th, 2009

So when you get on that reality TV show you always wanted to get on, remember. You’re not there to make friends. This is an important mantra to repeat, especially when you are about to get kicked off. When you get kicked off, you can then proclaim yourself bosom buddies with everyone still on the show.
via kottke.

Just a thought

Tuesday, March 10th, 2009

My roommates love to watch a show that comes on TLC about a family with 18 children. When it comes on, I sometimes find myself watching, despite my best intentions not to.

Two things I’ve noticed about the show strike me as strange. First, when the initial credits roll and the show is introduced, the mother of the family gives a voice-over in which she states that the family is very ‘value-oriented’ and, as a consequence, the parents place limits on their children’s TV time, reducing it to very small intervals.

I find this grating because the practice of limiting one’s TV time does not follow from the (moral?) stance of being a ‘value-oriented’ family. Of course, the term ‘value-oriented’ is in itself loaded, but leaving that aside, how can this not strike even the most non-committed viewer as nothing but an advertising ploy, a kind of clever demographic selection?

Furthermore, although the parents may limit the time that their children watch TV, is it not ironic that they allow their actual life to be filmed for a reality television program (a genre of television widely considered by the general public to be exploitative and morally questionable)? In other words, the link between their children’s life and television is more intimate, more intrusive, and more disturbing despite, and perhaps even because of, their ‘value-oriented’ approach to parenting.

Everything is a commodity

Thursday, March 5th, 2009

gravity paint

Even super heros need to go shopping, it seems.

Dollars

Wednesday, March 4th, 2009

funny money

How much I love you

Tuesday, March 3rd, 2009

love